Marvin Leon Grimm, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Clarence L. Jackson, Jr.; John A. Brown; George M.hampton, Jr.; Lewis W. Hurst; Frank E. Saunders; Gail Y.browne, Ph.d; Jacqueline F. Fraser; Edward C. Morris;larry W. Huffman; David K. Smith; Barbara J. Wheeler;bobby W. Soles; William P. Rogers; Julian U. Pugh;charles S. Robb; Gerald Baliles; L. Douglas Wilder;michael A. Shupe; Kim Gillespie; R. White; R.e. Beauford,jr.; J.c. Roseir, Defendants-appellees, 963 F.2d 367 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 963 F.2d 367 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted May 4, 1992. Decided May 18, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke, No. CA-91-501-R, James C. Turk, Chief District Judge.

Marvin Leon Grimm, Jr., appellant pro se.

Gayl Branum Carr, Office of the Atty. Gen., Richmond, Va., for appellees.

W.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


Marvin Leon Grimm, Jr. appeals from the district court's orders denying his motion to vacate judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), and his motion to reconsider, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Grimm v. Jackson, No. CA-91-501-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 31 and Mar. 3, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.