Frederick Paddock; Anna Paddock, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Robert Headley, Defendant-appellee, 963 F.2d 367 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 963 F.2d 367 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted: April 23, 1992Decided: May 26, 1992

Frederick Paddock, Anna Paddock, Appellants Pro Se.

John Sykes Martin, DUNTON, SIMMONS & DUNTON, White Stone, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, WIDENER, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Frederick and Anna Paddock appeal from the district court's order denying relief under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Virginia contract law. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Paddock v. Headley, No. CA-91-129R (E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.