Epifania v. Buquel, Petitioner, v. Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Respondent, 960 F.2d 154 (Fed. Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - 960 F.2d 154 (Fed. Cir. 1992) Feb. 11, 1992

Before PLAGER, Circuit Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.


The Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs moves to dismiss Epifania V. Buquel's petition for review for lack of jurisdiction and to suspend the requirement of filing a certified list. Buquel moves to "stay further proceedings based on new and material documentary evidence."

In her informal brief, Buquel states that she has been seeking death benefits from the VA since 1947. She attaches a June 8, 1990 regional office decision denying her claim for benefits based upon her deceased husband's alleged military service.

This court does not have jurisdiction to review Buquel's petition. Pursuant to the Veterans' Judicial Review Act of 1988, this court may review decisions of the Court of Veterans Appeals, 38 U.S.C. § 7292 (formerly § 4092), and may directly review certain actions of the Secretary, 38 U.S.C. § 502 (formerly § 223). This is not an appeal from a decision of the veterans court and Buquel is not challenging the promulgation or publication of a VA rule or regulation pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 502.

Where, as here, the government has moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, and it is evident on the face of the submissions that the case does not fall within the court's jurisdiction, dismissal is appropriate. Hilario v. Secretary, Dep't of Veterans Affairs, 937 F.2d 586, 589 (Fed. Cir. 1991).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Secretary's motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) The Secretary's motion to suspend the filing of the certified list is moot.

(3) Buquel's motion to stay is moot.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.