United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Robert Kersnick, Defendant-appellee, 960 F.2d 153 (9th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 960 F.2d 153 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted April 7, 1992. *Decided April 21, 1992

Before PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

We have jurisdiction over this appeal. See 18 U.S.C. § 3731; Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). The defendant's motion under Rule 35 was timely. Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988). The district court's factual finding that the government failed to comply with its sentencing order was not clearly erroneous.

The district court's order vacating and setting aside the defendant's sentence is AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for disposition without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.