United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Amobi U. Nmezi, Defendant-appellant, 960 F.2d 148 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 960 F.2d 148 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted: April 6, 1992Decided: April 16, 1992

Amobi U. Nmezi, Appellant Pro Se. Renee Runcel Christina, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

Amobi Nmezi noted this appeal of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion outside the sixty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (1). He moved for an extension of time within the limits provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (5), claiming as excusable neglect his frequent transfers and the inadequacy or lack of law libraries at some of the prisons to which he has been transferred. The district court denied the motion for extension of time. We find no abuse of discretion in that ruling. See United States v. Breit, 754 F.2d 526 (4th Cir. 1985). Nmezi's failure to note an appeal within the appeal period or to obtain an extension of time deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 260 (1978). We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.