Richard A. Stern, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Citywide Security Services, Incorporated, Defendant-appellee, 960 F.2d 147 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseRichard A. Stern, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Jeffrey Magid, Gary Steven Posner, Gerard Joseph Gaeng, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Richard A. Stern appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for relief from judgment filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (6). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stern v. Citywide Security Servs., Inc., No. CA89-3121-Y (D. Md. Nov. 25, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
