John Rodgers Burnley, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray; Edward C. Morris; Wade D. Blankenship;richard A. Young; Dr. Amonette; Dr. Walker; Dr. Morris;frances L. Ashley; Nurse Meade; Jimmy Hylton; Robert W.fry; Eugene F. Poutasse; the Medical Society of Virginiareview Organization, Inc., Defendants-appellees,andbland Correctional Center; Virginia Department Ofcorrections; David L. Smith; Betty Lane; P. L. Huffman;k. A. Polinsky; J. A. Hubbard; Director of the Statetreasury; C. D. Larsen; R. L. Chewning; F. Newberry; H.e. Wiley; J. A. Mustard; Officer Reeves, Defendants, 960 F.2d 145 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseJohn Rodgers Burnley, Appellant Pro Se.
Karen Lynn Lebo, Gayl Branum Carr, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia; Richard Edward Ladd, Jr., Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, Abingdon, Virginia; Lawrence Joseph Bracken, II, Cassandra Carol Collins, Hunton & Williams, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
John Rodgers Burnley appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burnley v. Murray, No. CA-91-176-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 25, 1991, Feb. 6, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.