Helmut Stich and Karen Stich, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. State of Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, et al.,defendants-appellees, 959 F.2d 241 (9th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseBefore WISDOM,** BEEZER and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM***
Because the district court, as a court of original jurisdiction, "has no authority to review the final determinations of a state court in judicial proceedings," MacKay v. Pfeil, 827 F.2d 540, 545 (9th Cir. 1987) (quotation omitted), the judgment of the district court dismissing plaintiffs' claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4
The Honorable John Minor Wisdom, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Cir.R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
