Sequoia Orange Co., Inc., Exeter Orange Co., Sequoiaenterprises, Petitioners, v. United States District Court for the Eastern District Ofcalifornia, Respondent,united States of America, Real Party in Interest, 958 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- 958 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1992)
March 17, 1992
Before CANBY and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and CARROLL,* District Judge.
ORDER
In Riverbend Farms v. Madigan, No. 90-15505, filed concurrently, we hold that past navel orange volume restrictions issued by the Secretary are enforceable. We therefore deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Bauman v. United States Dist. Ct., 557 F.2d 650, 654-55 (9th Cir. 1977).
*
The Honorable Earl H. Carroll, United States District Judge, District of Arizona, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
