United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Dominic Longo, Defendant-appellant, 958 F.2d 369 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-37-HM, CA-91-478-HM)
Dominic Longo, appellant pro se.
Breckinridge Long Willcox, United States Attorney, James Richard Alsup, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Dominic Longo appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Longo, Nos. CR-90-37-HM, CA-91-478-HM (D. Md. Dec. 18, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We deny Appellant's motions for a trial transcript at government expense and to stay these proceedings. We have considered Longo's recently filed "Supplimentic Authorities."
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
