United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Roderick Ian Nichols, Defendant-appellant,united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Roderick Ian Nichols, Defendant-appellant,united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Ronald Gregory Mccaffery, Defendant-appellantunited States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Steven Darrell Udell, Defendant-appellantunited States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Kenneth Alan Clagett, Defendant-appellantunited States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Owen Willis Turman, Defendant-appellantunited States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Kurtis Lee Bristow, Defendant-appellant, 956 F.2d 276 (9th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 956 F.2d 276 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted Jan. 8, 1992. *Decided Feb. 14, 1992

Before FARRIS, NOONAN and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER^**

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States v. Allen, No. 90-50666, slip op. (9th Cir. ______, 1992).

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and Ninth Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.