Michael F. Grzelak, Petitioner, v. United States Postal Service, Respondent, 956 F.2d 1173 (Fed. Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - 956 F.2d 1173 (Fed. Cir. 1992) Feb. 12, 1992

Before RICH, Circuit Judge, EDWARD S. SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge.

DECISION

RADER, Circuit Judge.


Michael F. Grzelak appeals the September 24, 1991 decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or Board), Docket No. SF07529110551. The Board dismissed Mr. Grzelak's appeal as untimely filed under 5 C.F.R. § 1201.22(b) (1991). This court affirms.

OPINION

The Postal Service removed Mr. Grzelak on November 9, 1979. In February 1980, after a grievance procedure, the Postal Service reinstated Mr. Grzelak without back pay. On April 1, 1991, Mr. Grzelak appealed to the MSPB to review his removal and to seek back pay. The MSPB dismissed Mr. Grzelak's appeal because it was filed more than 11 years after the effective removal date of November 9, 1979. Mr. Grzelak now appeals the Board's dismissal, alleging that he has shown good cause to justify a waiver of the § 1201.22(b) filing time limit.

Appeals to the MSPB must be filed within twenty days of the effective date of the contested agency action. 5 C.F.R. § 1201.22(b). In the absence of good cause for an untimely appeal, the Board must dismiss the late filing. 5 C.F.R. § 1201.22(c). Mr. Grzelak alleges that his union representative and the post-master incorrectly told him that he could not file an appeal to the MSPB at the same time that the union filed a grievance on his behalf. Mr. Grzelak now states that he recently learned that he was entitled to simultaneously pursue both avenues of relief. Mr. Grzelak argues that the postmaster's and union's representatives alleged misrepresentations justify a waiver of the twenty-day filing requirement.

The Board has broad discretion to decide whether to waive the time for appeal. Womack v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 798 F.2d 453, 456 (Fed. Cir. 1986). In this case, the Board found no credible evidence that Mr. Grzelak was misled nor any excuse for an eleven year delay in appealing. This court discerns no abuse of discretion in, or lack of substantial evidence for, the Board's dismissal. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(c) (1988). Affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.