United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Prince Dortch, Defendant-appellant, 956 F.2d 1168 (9th Cir. 1992)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 956 F.2d 1168 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted Feb. 13, 1992. *Decided March 11, 1992

Before CANBY, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Prince Dortch appeals his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines and his jury conviction for possession with intent to distribute in excess of five grams of a mixture and substance containing cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) (1) and 841(b) (1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel for Dortch has filed a brief stating that he finds no issues for review and a motion to withdraw. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment and grant the motion of Robert M. Leen, Esq., to withdraw as counsel of record.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.