Sebastian C. Sisti, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Incorporated,defendant-appellee, 955 F.2d 42 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 955 F.2d 42 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted Dec. 6, 1991. Decided Feb. 21, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-91-102-R)

Sebastian C. Sisti, appellant pro se.

John Charles Thomas, Edward Joseph Fuhr, Hunton & Williams, Richmond, Va., for appellee.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


Sebastian C. Sisti appeals from the district court's order dismissing his Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sisti v. Merrill Lynch, No. CA-91-102-R (E.D. Va. Apr. 22, 1991). However, Merrill Lynch's request for costs and attorneys' fees resulting from this appeal is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.