Derek Dion Curtis, I, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Robert Mcdowell, F.b.i. Agent; Special Agent in Charge;federal Bureau of Investigation; John Does; Janedoes, Defendants-appellees.derek Dion Curtis, I, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Robert Bergin; Jane Irwin; Ronald Schwartz, Captain,baltimore County Police Department; Kalista, Captain,baltimore County Police Department; Robert Mcdowell;patricia Bach; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-appellees.derek Dion Curtis, I, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Friedland; Furniture Quarter's Store, Defendants-appellees, 955 F.2d 40 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 955 F.2d 40 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted Feb. 3, 1992. Decided Feb. 14, 1992. As Amended March, 24, 1992

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-91-902-B, CA-91-1291-B, CA-91-1513-B)

Derek Dion Curtis, I, appellant pro se.

Richard Douglas Bennett, United States Attorney, Juliet Ann Eurich, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., John Alston, Baltimore County Office of Law, Towson, Md., Ronald Schwartz, Baltimore County Police Department, Catonsville, Md., for appellees.

D. Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


Derek Dion Curtis, I appeals from the district court's order which granted summary judgment to the Defendants in his three complaints filed pursuant to Bivins v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Curtis v. McDowell, No. CA-91-902-B; Curtis v. Bergin, No. CA-91-1291-B; Curtis v. Friedland, No. CA-91-1513-B (D. Md. Oct. 25, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.