Charles Jones, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Wade L. Knight, C.o. Ii; Charles Mcclain, C.o. Ii; A.n.wright, C.o. Ii; B.j. Allen, C.o. Iv; W.b.bridges, C.o. V; Petty, C.o.;presbury, C.o. Iii,defendants-appellees.charles Jones, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Arnold J. Hopkins, Commissioner of Corrections; Howard N.lyles, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary; Bernard Smith,assistant Warden, Maryland Penitentiary; Hollis Thompson,correctional Officer Vi Shift Commander, Marylandpenitentiary; I.a. Hawkins, Correctional Officer V, Shiftduty Captain; Lawrence Carpenter, Security Chief, Marylandpenitentiary; Danny Staten, Correctional Officer Ii,defendants-appellees, 953 F.2d 638 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 953 F.2d 638 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted Nov. 27, 1991. Decided Jan. 22, 1992

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-87-1550-JFM; CA-88-195-JFM)

Charles Jones, appellant pro se.

Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Philip Melton Andrews, Aron Uri Raskas, Kramon & Graham, P.A., Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D. Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


Charles Jones appeals from the district court's orders denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the records and the district court's opinions accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge discloses that these appeals are without merit.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Knight, No. CA-87-1550-JFM (D. Md. June 4, 1991); Jones v. Hopkins, No. CA-88-195-JFM (D. Md. May 29, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.