Wilfred Lee, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc., Defendant-appellee, 953 F.2d 1387 (9th Cir. 1992)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 953 F.2d 1387 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted Jan. 28, 1992. *Decided Jan. 31, 1992

Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and SNEED and ALARCON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Wilfred Lee appeals pro se from the district court's judgment in favor of his former employer, Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc. ("Lockheed"). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Lee's complaint asserted seven claims against Lockheed: (1) age discrimination, (2) wrongful discharge, (3) conspiracy, (4) unlawful imprisonment, (5) forgery, (6) national origin discrimination, and (7) harassment. On November 30, 1989, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Lockheed on claims two through seven. The age discrimination claim was tried before a United States Magistrate; on June 25, 1990 the Magistrate granted Lockheed's motion for an involuntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

In his briefs on appeal, Lee does not present any basis upon which the district court's judgment could be overturned. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment based on the analyses set forth in the court's thorough and well-reasoned orders of November 30, 1989 and June 25, 1990.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.