Freddie L. Perry, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Michael Quinlan, et al., Defendant-appellees, 951 F.2d 1260 (10th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseORDER AND JUDGMENT**
Before MCKAY, Chief Judge, and SEYMOUR and EBEL, Circuit Judges.*
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Perry appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)), against the United States Parole Commission and various state officials. We grant the appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
After examining the record, we conclude that the district court correctly dismissed the action for substantially the reasons stated in its Memorandum and Order of October 28, 1991. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment below. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the case is ordered submitted without oral argument
This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
