Robert Camren, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Gary D. Maynard, Sonny Scott, and Sid Benifiled, Defendants-appellees, 947 F.2d 953 (10th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseBefore McKAY, Chief Judge, and SEYMOUR and EBEL, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the case is ordered submitted without oral argument.
We grant Plaintiff-Appellee Camren's motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
Camren appeals the district court's dismissal of his action against Oklahoma state correctional officials. Camren filed suit against these officials pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Camren seeks to obtain a copy of the record on appeal. However, because the district court denied Camren leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, no record on appeal yet exists.
After examining the district court's record, we conclude that the district court correctly dismissed the claim for the reasons stated in its order of December 19, 1990. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment below.
This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
