Citizens for a Better Environment, Jean Siri, Sierra Club,plaintiffs-appellees, v. George Deukmejian, Governor of State of California, et al., Defendants,andmetropolitan Transportation Commission, Defendant-appellant, 946 F.2d 898 (9th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 946 F.2d 898 (9th Cir. 1991) Argued and Submitted Sept. 11, 1991. Decided Oct. 21, 1991

Before CANBY and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and HUFF,*  District Judge.

MEMORANDUM** 

The district court, confronted with MTC's ongoing violation of the court's May 7, 1990, order, fashioned an equitable remedy. In so doing, it carefully weighed the competing interests and concerns; the injunction was narrowly tailored to deal with the problem before the court. See December 21, 1990 order at 24-30. Equitable principles were applied; there was no abuse of discretion.

Some parts of the injunction, however, are moot: Paragraph 1 (id at 30) has been complied with, and paragraph 3 (id at 31) applied only "pending implementation of a valid conformity procedure" and thus was rendered moot by the court's March 11, 1991, order. Paragraph 2 of the order is not moot because it requires judicial supervision of conformity assessments until the SIP is revised. Because MTC now has a judicially approved conformity assessment procedure (see March 11 order), paragraph 2 of the injunction requires MTC to conform to its own procedure.

We vacate paragraphs 1 and 3 of the December 21 order as moot and affirm the remainder so far as is consistent with our disposition of this appeal.

VACATED in part as moot and AFFIRMED in part. Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.

 *

The Honorable Marilyn Huff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.