Gregory Marshall, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Edward A. Brown, Detective, Homicide, Sharon May, Donaldsteinhice, Defendants-appellees.gregory Marshall, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Sharon May, Robert Feinberg, Assistant Federal Publicdefender, Kurt Schmoke, Mayor, Defendants-appellees.gregory Marshall, Plaintiff-appellant, v. David Ross, Judge, William Donald Schaefer, Sharon May,sewall Smith, Defendants-appellees, 946 F.2d 886 (4th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseAppeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-91-693-JFM, CA-91-718-JFM, CA-91-790-JFM, CA-91-746-JFM, CA-91-747-JFM)
Gregory Marshall, appellant pro se.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Marshall appeals from the district court's orders denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the records and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Marshall v. Brown, CA-91-693-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 27, 1991); Marshall v. May, CA-91-718-JFM; CA-91-790-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 27, 1991); Marshall v. Ross, CA-91-746-JFM, CA-91-747-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 30, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Marshall's motions to amend his appeals are granted to the extent that the arguments raised in those motions have been considered in the disposition of these appeals.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.