Philis Shipman, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Baltimore, E.b.w. Properties, Incorporated, Harry W.stevens Maintenance Services, Incorporated, Thebaltimore Orioles, Incorporated,defendants-appellees, 940 F.2d 653 (4th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-89-2049-S)
Arelious Calvin Wilson, McCants & Dunbar, Silver Spring, Md. (Argued), for appellant; Leonard L. McCants, McCants & Dunbar, Silver Spring, Md., on brief. Michael John Collins, Smith, Somerville & Case, Baltimore, Md., (Argued), for appellees Baltimore Orioles and City of Baltimore, Jeffrey J. Plum, Smith, Somerville & Case, Baltimore, Md., on brief.
David W. Allen, Goodell, Devries, Leech & Gray, Baltimore, Md., (argued), for appellee Stevens Maintenance;
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge, CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and CLAUDE M. HILTON, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
After a full review of the record in this case, this court hereby affirms the judgment of the district court which granted motions for summary judgment to The Baltimore Orioles and Harry M. Stevens Maintenance Service. We affirm on the reasoning of the district court as expressed by U.S. Magistrate Klein in his memorandum opinion. Shipman v. The Baltimore Orioles, Inc., CA-89-2049-S (D. Md. Oct. 5, 1990).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
