940 F.2d 652: Phillip Locklear, Plaintiff-appellant. v. R.a. Broadwell, C.m. Bustle, Defendants-appellees,andjames M. Peterson, Ottis F. Jones, J. Hutcheson, Defendants

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. - 940 F.2d 652

Submitted Nov. 20, 1989.Decided July 26, 1991


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge.

(CA-87-550-CRT)

Phillip Locklear, appellant pro se.

David F. Hoke, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Phillip Locklear appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Locklear v. Broadwell, A-87-550-CRT (E.D.N.C. July 24, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Unpublished Disposition