Unpublished Disposition, 937 F.2d 612 (9th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 937 F.2d 612 (9th Cir. 1991)

No. 89-56319.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Before SCHROEDER and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and KING* , Senior District Judge.

MEMORANDUM** 

On a motion for summary judgment, the trial court found that there was no issue of triable fact as to whether an additional loan of $300,000 from Sun Savings and Loan Association to Leonard A. Bloom was secured by real property owned by Marquee (a Delaware Corporation of which Bloom was an officer), which had been pledged to Sun for an earlier loan of $2,000,000. Our review of the record shows that there are, at least, genuine issues of material fact as to the effect the second "Modification Agreement" had upon the amount secured by Sun's deed of trust to the pledged property. Further, assuming that Sun's deed of trust was modified to secure the $300,000 additional loan, genuine issues of material fact exist as to First Federal Savings Bank of California's knowledge of Sun's additional $300,000 security interest in the pledged property. If First Federal did have actual notice that the amount secured by Sun's deed of trust was $2,300,000, then First Federal's security interest in the property would not be senior to any portion of the loan from Sun Savings. See Cal.Civ.Code Sec. 1217.

Thus, the trial court's conclusion that, as a matter of law, First Federal's security interest in the pledged property was senior to the $300,000 additional loan was erroneous. Because material issues of fact remain, summary judgment in favor of First Federal should not have been granted.

REVERSED.

 *

The Honorable Samuel P. King, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Circuit Rule 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.