Unpublished Dispositionunited States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Scott Andrew Witzke, Defendant-appellant, 936 F.2d 574 (6th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 936 F.2d 574 (6th Cir. 1991) June 14, 1991

Before MERRITT, Chief Circuit Judge, and ALAN E. NORRIS and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence entered pursuant to his plea of guilty to impeding a federal judge, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a), claiming that the trial judge should have disqualified himself from hearing his case. Specifically, defendant claims that the trial judge should have disqualified himself under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) or, alternatively, under 28 U.S.C. § 455(b) (1). Having carefully considered the record on appeal, and the briefs of the parties, we find that these claims are without merit and affirm the conviction.

With respect to defendant's argument that the two-year term of supervised release imposed at sentencing was unlawfully excessive, the government agrees that the term of supervised release should not have exceeded one year under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b) (3).1  We therefore VACATE and REMAND to the district court for proper resentencing.

 1

A violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111 is a Class E felony for which the maximum authorized term of supervised release is not more than one year under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b) (3)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.