Johnny B. Turner, Petitioner, v. Clinchfield Coal Company, Director, Office of Workers'compensation Programs, United States Department Oflabor, Respondents, 936 F.2d 567 (4th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 936 F.2d 567 (4th Cir. 1991) Submitted March 18, 1991. Decided June 28, 1991

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (87-2644-BLA)

Johnny B. Turner, petitioner pro se.

Michael F. Blair, Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, Abingdon, Va., Edward O. Falkowski, Marta Kusic, Barbara J. Johnson, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

DISMISSED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Johnny Turner seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901 et seq. The Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs ("Director"), however, has filed a motion to dismiss Turner's petition for review as untimely.

The applicable filing period for appeals to this Court from decisions of the Board is 60 days. 33 U.S.C. § 921(c). We have held that the failure to file a petition for review in the Circuit court within the time period prescribed by Sec. 921(c) deprives the court of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. See Adkins v. Director, OWCP, 889 F.2d 1360 (4th Cir. 1989). The mistaken filing of a petition with the wrong party or judicial body cannot toll the expiration of the 60-day filing period. See Adkins, supra. See also Shendock v. Director, OWCP, 893 F.2d 1458 (3d Cir. 1990) (en banc); Mussato v. Director, OWCP, 855 F.2d 513 (8th Cir. 1988).

We are therefore constrained to grant the Director's motion and dismiss Turner's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.