Unpublished Dispositionanita Mason, Individually and As Personal Representative Ofthe Estate of Harlan Clay Mason, Deceased,plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Detroit, City of Detroit Police Department, Williamhart, and Gary Chapman, Defendants-appellees, 935 F.2d 270 (6th Cir. 1991)

Plaintiff, Anita Mason, appeals from the order of the district court granting summary judgment to defendants, the City of Detroit and Gary Chapman.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are unable to say that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants.

As the reasons why judgment should be entered for defendants have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning set out by that court in its memorandum opinion and order dated June 4, 1990.