Unpublished Dispositionpatricia Butler, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-appellee, 930 F.2d 918 (6th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 930 F.2d 918 (6th Cir. 1991) April 10, 1991

Before RALPH B. GUY, Jr. and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and WELLFORD, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER

The plaintiff appeals a district court order denying her motion to remand her case to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for reconsideration of her claim for widow's insurance benefits. The district court has not yet ruled on the merits of the plaintiff's claim. The defendant now moves to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the district court has not issued a final judgment. The plaintiff has not responded.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, courts of appeals have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts of the United States. A judgment is final if it leaves nothing remaining for the district court to do except execute the judgment. Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945). A district court's denial of a motion to remand is not a final order and is not reviewable on appeal. See Aaron v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburg, 876 F.2d 1157, 1160 (5th Cir. 1989) cert. denied, 110 S. Ct. 1121 (1990).

Upon review and consideration, the court concludes that the district court has not yet entered a final judgment in this case. In the absence of a final order this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the plaintiff's appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is granted. This order is without prejudice to the plaintiff's right to perfect a timely appeal when final judgment is rendered by the district court.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.