Unpublished Dispositionisaiah Seidner, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Thomas Mcnally, Sr., Philip Elliott, Stewart A. Newblatt,defendants-appellees, 928 F.2d 1133 (6th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseE.D. Mich., No. 90-40132.
E.D. Mich.
AFFIRMED.
Before KRUPANSKY and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Isaiah Seidner, a pro se Michigan resident, appeals the district court's order dismissing his action. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and appellant's brief, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).
The district court dismissed the complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Mr. Seidner has filed a timely appeal. Upon review, we conclude that Mr. Seidner's complaint lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact and, therefore, was properly dismissed as frivolous.
Accordingly, the district court's judgment is hereby affirmed pursuant to Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
