In Re Grand Jury, 89-4, John Doe # 2, A89-098.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Under Seal, Defendant-appellant, 925 F.2d 1456 (4th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CR-89-4)
Under Seal, appellant pro se.
Mark Joseph Hulkower, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Va., for appellee.
E.D. Va.
DISMISSED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant in this case seeks to overturn three orders of the district court which granted a motion to compel testimony in a grand jury proceeding, and denied motions to quash a subpoena ducas tecum and for a stay pending appeal. The target of the grand jury proceeding has been indicted, convicted and sentenced. This appeal is, therefore, moot. See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated June 5, 1985, 825 F.2d 231 (9th Cir. 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
