Reginald Clinton Stitt, Plaintiff-appellant, v. St. J. Berry, Nottoway Correctional Center, Mecklenburgcorrectional Center, I.c.c., T.c. Bullock, Mccadjustment Comm., Lt. L. Hawkins,defendants-appellees, 915 F.2d 1565 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-88-400-N)
Reginald Clinton Stitt, appellant pro se.
Jeanette Dian Rogers, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Clinton Stitt seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stitt v. Berry, CA-88-400-N (E.D. Va. June 19, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
