Roger L. Crawford, Plaintiff-appellant,andunited States of America, Ex Rel, Plaintiff, v. West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, District Court Ofsummers County, Defendants-appellees, 915 F.2d 1564 (4th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 915 F.2d 1564 (4th Cir. 1990) Submitted Aug. 27, 1990. Decided Sept. 28, 1990

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden, II, Chief District Judge. (CA-90-429-5)

Roger L. Crawford, appellant pro se.

S.D.W. Va.

DISMISSED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Roger L. Crawford noted this appeal outside the 30-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (1), and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional 30-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (5). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case.*  We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

 *

Crawford's "petition for relief of judgment order" was filed 21 days after judgment was entered and did not toll the 30-day appeal period in Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). See Dove v. CODESCO, 569 F.2d 807 (4th Cir. 1978)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.