Unpublished Disposition, 914 F.2d 264 (9th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 914 F.2d 264 (9th Cir. 1990)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jeffrey A. SAGORSKY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-50418.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 18, 1990.^* Decided Sept. 20, 1990.

Before Goodwin, Chief Judge, Hug and Beezer, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

Jeffrey A. Sagorsky appeals the district court's order revoking his probation. Sagorsky contends that the district court erred by revoking his probation because the district judge automatically imposed the maximum term of imprisonment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We review for an abuse of discretion or fundamental unfairness a district court's decision to revoke probation. United State v. Tham, 884 F.2d 1262, 1264 (9th Cir. 1989).

After careful consideration we find no abuse of discretion.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for disposition without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.