Unpublished Dispositionrobert A. Gallagher, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William Lavery, Sheriff, William Harrah, Defendants-appellees, 911 F.2d 732 (6th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 911 F.2d 732 (6th Cir. 1990) Aug. 21, 1990

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, J., and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and SILER, Chief District Judge.* 


ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and the brief, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

Robert Gallagher filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in which he alleged he suffered civil rights deprivations during his 1989 stay at the Delaware County [Ohio] Jail. The district court dismissed the complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) and this appeal followed. Gallagher has submitted a brief in his own behalf.

A complaint is frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) if it lacks an arguable basis in law or in fact. Neitzke v. Williams, 109 S. Ct. 1827, 1831 (1989). The record supports the district court's characterization of the case as frivolous. Gallagher's litany of petty grievances and minor inconveniences does not amount to an arguable civil rights claim.

Accordingly, for these reasons and for the reasons set forth in the district court's opinion filed January 18, 1990, the judgment is affirmed. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

 *

The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Chief U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.