Unpublished Dispositionquality Technology Company, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Stone & Webster Engineering Company, Inc., Stemarcorporation, Beta, Inc., Steven A. White,defendants-appellees, 909 F.2d 1484 (6th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseBefore KRUPANSKY and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and WENDELL A. MILES, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, Quality Technology Company, appeals from the district court's having granted summary judgment to defendants.
Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are unable to say that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to the defendants.
As the reasons why judgment should be entered for defendants have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning set out by that court in its memorandum opinions of March 27, 1989 and June 1, 1989.
The Honorable Wendell A. Miles, Senior United States District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by assignment
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
