James Edmond Watts, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James R. Cullinane; Virginia Parole Board State Officialsunknown; Eric Peters; G.o. Clemens; T.p.patrone; T.p. Jamerson, Defendants-appellees, 904 F.2d 702 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 89-140-R).
James Edmond Watts, appellant pro se.
James R. Cullinane, Eric Peters, for appellees; Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va.; Elizabeth Kay Dillon, Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, Va.; Walter Clyde Erwin, III, Assistant City Attorney, Lynchburg, Va., on briefs.
W.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
James Edmond Watts appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Watts v. Cullinane, C/A No. 89-140-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 2, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
