Unpublished Disposition, 902 F.2d 42 (9th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.William R. STEPHENS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 89-30257.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 7, 1990.* Decided May 14, 1990.
Before FARRIS, PREGERSON and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
William Stephens pled guilty and was convicted of being an accessory after the fact to the theft of an automobile, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3. The district court sentenced Stephens to twelve months' incarceration with one year of supervised release and imposed a fine of $15,870. Stephens refused to file a financial statement with the Probation Office. Stephens now appeals the fine as excessive and beyond his ability to pay.
We review sentencing on an abuse of discretion standard. United States v. Yarbrough, 852 F.2d 1522, 1545 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 109 S. Ct. 171 (1988). There is nothing in the record to indicate an abuse of discretion by the district court. Accordingly, the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.