Troussant Delano Lett, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Surry County Court; Gammiel G. Poindexter; Frank Emmerson;officer Gooding; Edward Murray, Director; Dan Larsen,manager; Rus Wilson, Manager; James A. Smith, Jr.,regional Administrator, Defendants-appellees, 898 F.2d 146 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (C/A No. 88-535-R)
Troussant Delano Lett, appellant pro se.
Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General; Gerald G. Poindexter, Poindexter & Poindexter; Dana Burdett Sykes, Hirschler, Fleischer, Weinberg, Cox & Allen, for appellees.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Troussant Delano Lett appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lett v. Surry County Court, C/A No. 88-535-R (E.D. Va. July 7, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
