Alice H. Wood, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Richmond, Defendant-appellee, 896 F.2d 1368 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseAlice H. Wood, appellant pro se.
Michael Lawrence Sarahan, Assistant City Attorney, for appellee.
Before CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Alice H. Wood appeals from the district court's orders denying relief under 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wood v. City of Richmond, C/A No. 89-27-R (E.D. Va. June 20, 1989; Aug. 16, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
