Thomas Lee Mitchell, A/k/a Thomas Lugman Muwwakkil,planitiff-appellant, v. Edward Murray; Edward Morris; Thomas Israel; J.armentrout; L. Jarvis; Captain Day; Captain Counts;lieutenant Hinton; Lieutenant Holloway; R. Boyer;sergeant Harris; Sergeant Syler; Ms. Eichinger; Nursewhite; Nurse Murphy; Nurse Hicks; Roger Huffman;shifflett, Jr.; Ms. Smiley; Billie D. Reeves; W.p.rogers; Doctor Fox, Defendants-appellees, 896 F.2d 1367 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseThomas Lee Mitchell, appellant pro se.
Eric Karl Gould Fiske, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia; Edward Meade Macon, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, for appellees.
Before PHILLIPS, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Lee Mitchell appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mitchell v. Murray, C/A No. 88-159-H (W.D. Va. May 11, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
