Unpublished Dispositionvictor J. Russell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Samuel Mariani, Parole Officer; John Doe, Unit Supervisor;raymond E. Capots, Chairman, Adult Parole Authority;richard P. Seiter, Director, Department of Rehabilitationand Corrections; Richard Celeste, Governor, of Ohio,defendants-appellees, 894 F.2d 1337 (6th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 894 F.2d 1337 (6th Cir. 1990) Jan. 31, 1990

Before MILBURN and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

Victor J. Russell appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Russell alleged that the defendant parole officer gave misleading testimony during a pretrial hearing with the result that Russell was deprived of his right to a speedy trial on the underlying criminal charge. Upon consideration, we conclude that the complaint was properly dismissed.

Clearly, witnesses in judicial proceedings enjoy absolute immunity from suit for damages under section 1983 for claims arising from their testimony. Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983); Alioto v. City of Shively, 835 F.2d 1173, 1174 (6th Cir. 1987). Plaintiff's attempts to distinguish this complaint are patently frivolous. Defendant was properly accorded absolute immunity from suit based upon the acts alleged.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.