Francisco R. Gongora, Petitioner, v. Office of Personnel Management, Respondent, 892 F.2d 1050 (Fed. Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - 892 F.2d 1050 (Fed. Cir. 1989) Dec. 18, 1989

Before BISSELL, ARCHER and MAYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


DECISION

The final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board), Docket No. SE08318910245, affirming the Office of Personnel Management's denial of Francisco R. Gongora's annuity claim, is affirmed.

OPINION

Contrary to Gongora's assertions, we could not overturn the Board's decision even if we concluded that the preponderance of evidence tips the scale in his direction. For us to reverse, Gongora must establish that the Board's decision is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law, or obtained without procedures required by law, rule, or regulation having been followed, or unsupported by substantial evidence. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(c) (1988); Cheeseman v. Office of Personnel Management, 791 F.2d 138, 140 (Fed. Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1037 (1987).

The Administrative Judge's finding that Gongora failed to present evidence establishing that any of his 17 years with the Department of the Navy were creditable towards a civil service retirement annuity is supported by substantial evidence. None of Gongora's Standard Form 50s indicate that he was covered by the Civil Service Retirement Act. Accordingly, Gongora's claim for an annuity was properly denied for failure to meet the minimum five-year requirement. See 5 U.S.C. § 8333(a) (1988).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.