United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Alfred L. Cameron, Defendant-appellant, 892 F.2d 1047 (9th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseBefore JAMES R. BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Cameron appeals the district court's order dismissing his petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Cameron's petition raises three issues: vindictive prosecution, double jeopardy, and ineffective assistance of counsel. First, to invoke a presumption of vindictiveness, the defendant must establish an appearance of vindictiveness. United States v. Robison, 644 F.2d 1270, 1271 (9th Cir. 1981). Cameron has failed to adduce any facts that meet this threshold burden. Second, Cameron claims double jeopardy. We have already considered and decided this issue in our Memorandum Decision of February 3, 1978. Finally, Cameron claims ineffective assistance of counsel. Cameron has raised this claim in prior § 2255 petitions. Nothing in this petition could not have been raised in earlier petitions. Thus, given the interests in finality to the process, Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107, 126, 102 S. Ct. 1558, 71 L. Ed. 2d 783 (1982), and pursuant to Rule 9(b) of the Rules governing § 2255 proceedings, this claim was properly dismissed.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.