United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Mack Daniel Chisolm, Defendant-appellant, 889 F.2d 1085 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseMack Daniel Chisolm, appellant pro se.
Robert Hayden Bickerton, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Mack Daniel Chisolm appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Chisolm, CR No. 87-312 (D.S.C. May 16, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
In light of our view of the issues presented, we deny Chisolm's motion for appointment of counsel
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
