Unpublished Dispositionunited States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. George Martin, Defendant-appellant, 885 F.2d 872 (6th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 885 F.2d 872 (6th Cir. 1989) Sept. 25, 1989

Before MERRITT and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges, and JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge* .

ORDER

This Court entered an order August 28, 1989 directing the defendant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The defendant responded that despite the untimely notice of appeal, he should be permitted to proceed.

Compliance with the time requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 4(b) is a mandatory and jurisdictional requirement which this Court cannot waive or extend. United States v. Merrifield, 764 F.2d 436, 437 (5th Cir. 1985) (per curiam) ; see also Browder v. Director, Department of Corrections of Illinois, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978). Since the defendant has neither sought nor received an extension of time from the district court, his appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

It is ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed sua sponte. Rule 9(b), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

 *

The Honorable James L. Graham, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.