Winston Lloyd, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Melvin Steinberg, James Aluisi, Joanne Douglas, Individuallyand Official Capacity, Defendants-appellees, 885 F.2d 865 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseWinston Lloyd, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Steven Giles Hildenbrand, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, for appellee Steinberg.
Joel David Worshtil, Hendershot & Worshtil, for appellee Aluisi.
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Winston Lloyd appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lloyd v. Steinberg, C/A No. 87-3295-B (D. Md. July 25, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
