Unpublished Disposition, 884 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1989)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 884 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1989)

Stanley Ezell SINGLETON, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Robert DARAN; and John K. Van De Kamp, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 88-1559.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 19, 1989.* Decided Aug. 30, 1989.

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and POOLE and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

ORDER** 

We affirm the district court's order denying Singleton's 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 habeas petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. After the district court entered its order denying habeas relief, the California Court of Appeals affirmed Singleton's conviction. If this subsequent event has resulted in an exhaustion of state remedies, Singleton may file a new Section 2254 habeas petition in district court.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Circuit Rule 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Circuit Rule 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.