United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Gary Steven Mandel, Defendant-appellant, 884 F.2d 1390 (4th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 884 F.2d 1390 (4th Cir. 1989) Submitted July 17, 1989. Decided Aug. 30, 1989

Gary Steven Mandel, appellant pro se.

Joseph Sedwick Sollers, (Office of the United States Attorney), for appellee.

Before HARRISON L. WINTER and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Gary Steven Mandel appeals from the district court's order denying Mandel's motion for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Mandel, CR No. 85-156-JH (D. Md. Jun. 30, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.