Unpublished Dispositionkaral Hasani Efia Battle-el, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Robert Brown, Jr., John Jabe, Wayne Jackson, Jerry Hofbauer,john Prelesnik, Robert Atherton, Gary Barker, Matthewhensley, Richard W. Moats, Richard W. Thrams, Joe Mcferran,john Pieron, Robert Ball, Don Challgren, Gary E. Moore, Tomgoodin, Marvin A. Pettit, Thomas L. Desantis, Kirk Mcvittie,steve Mcclain, Jackey Teitelbaum, Mary Tuttle, Craig Dreyer,james Lampman, Robert Fredricks, Austin Jimenez, Thomastaylor, Ronald Baxter, Defendants-appellees, 880 F.2d 1321 (6th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 880 F.2d 1321 (6th Cir. 1989) Aug. 4, 1989

Before NELSON and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and HENRY R. WILHOIT, District Judge.* 

ORDER

This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

A review of the documents before the court indicates that on May 5, 1989, the district court filed an order granting in part and denying in part the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The defendants were ordered to respond to the two claims contained in the complaint. The plaintiff appealed from that order.

Absent a Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) certification, an order disposing of fewer than all the claims involved in the action is not appealable. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wetzel, 424 U.S. 737, 742-45 (1976); Solomon v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 782 F.2d 58, 59-60 (6th Cir. 1986). No Rule 54(b) certification was made in the instant case. The final decision of the district court has not been entered during the pendency of this appeal; therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction. See Gillis v. Department of HHS, 759 F.2d 565, 569 (6th Cir. 1985).

It is ORDERED that the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b) (1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

 *

The Honorable Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr., U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.