David Bright, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James Rollins; Bernard Smith, Assistant Warden, Defendants-appellees, 879 F.2d 862 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseDavid Bright, appellant pro se.
Before MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
David Bright appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Bright v. Rollins, CA N-89-927 (D. Md., Apr. 4, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
For the purpose of clarification, we note that the proper citations to the cases relied upon by the district court are: Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215 (1976), and Paoli v. Lally, 812 F.2d 1489 (4th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 56 U.S.L.W. 3247 (U.S. Oct. 5, 1987) (No. 87-5202)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
